"Everybody is dead in 2 two years"

 Prof. Luc Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE).

While it is understood that viruses mutate, causing variants, French Virologist and Nobel Prize Winner Luc Montagnier contends that “it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.”

The 2008 Nobel Laureate made the explosive comments as part of a larger interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media earlier this month. The clip was exclusively translated for RAIR Foundation USA, and is quite damning for the agenda-driven left-wing establishment.

As reported at RAIR in April of last year, Prof. Montagnier presented a powerful case that the coronavirus was created in a lab. His comments at the time offended the left-wing establishment so much that they aggressively attempted to discredit his statement. Now, the media is backpedaling on the origin of the coronavirus after prominent scientists called for further scrutiny.

Vaccines are Creating the Variants

Prof. Montagnier referred to the vaccine program for the coronavirus as an “unacceptable mistake”. Mass vaccinations are a “scientific error as well as a medical error,” he said. “It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants,” Prof. Luc Montagnier continued.

The prominent virologist explained that “there are antibodies, created by the vaccine,” forcing the virus to “find another solution” or die. This is where the variants are created. It is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement

Prof. Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE). In the articles that mention ADE, the concerns expressed by Prof. Montagnier are dismissed. “Scientists say that ADE is pretty much a non-issue with COVID-19 vaccines,” an article at Medpage Today reported in March.

Prof. Montagnier explained that the trend is happening in “each country” where “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.”

The Nobel Laureate’s point is emphasized by information revealed in an open letter from a long list of medical doctors to the European Medicines Agency. The letter stated in part that “there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents.”

Earlier this month, RAIR reported on a statement by French Virologist Christine Rouzioux:

“…the rise in new cases is occurring in vaccinated patients in nursing homes in ‘Montpellier, in the Sarte, in Rheims, in the Moselle…”

Prof. Luc Montagnier continued to say that he is doing his own experiments with those who become infected with the coronavirus after getting the vaccine. “I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine,” he said.

Watch the clip (transcribed below):

Many thanks to HeHa and Miss Piggy for the translation!

(Questions are bolded)

If we look at the curve from the WHO, since the vaccinations started in January, the curve showing new infections (contamination) has exploded, along with deaths.

Notably among young people.

—Yes. With thromboses, etc.

How do you view the mass vaccination program? Mass vaccination compared to treatments that work and aren’t expensive.

—It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.

—For the China virus, there are antibodies, created by the vaccine. What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?

—The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination. You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.

—I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated. I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine.

Should we be vaccinating during a pandemic?

—It’s unthinkable.

—They’re silent… many people know this, epidemiologists know it.

—It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger.

—It’s what we call Antibody Dependent Enhancement, which means antibodies favor a certain infection. The antibody attaches to the virus, from that moment it has the receptors, the antibodies, we have them in the macrophage etc.

—It pokes the virus and not accidentally, but because of the fact that they’re linked to the antibodies.

—It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. OK?

They have not yet edited his Wikipedia item, so here it is:

Luc Montagnier

Luc Antoine Montagnier (US: /ˌmɒntənˈjeɪ, ˌmoʊntɑːnˈjeɪ/;[2] US: /mənˈ-/,[3] French: [mɔ̃taɲe]; born 18 August 1932) is a French virologist and joint recipient, with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Harald zur Hausen, of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).[4] He has worked as a researcher at the Pasteur Institute in Paris and as a full-time professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China.[5]Contents

1History of the discovery of HIV

2Awards and honors

3Research on electromagnetic signals from DNA

3.1Responses, criticisms and interview

3.2Legal battle over patent

4Coronavirus pandemic

5See also

6References

7External links

History of the discovery of HIV[edit]

In 1982, Willy Rozenbaum, a clinician at the Hôpital Bichat hospital in Paris, asked Montagnier for assistance in establishing the cause of a mysterious new syndrome, AIDS (known at the time as “gay-related immune deficiency” or GRID). Rozenbaum had suggested at scientific meetings that the cause of the disease might be a retrovirus. Montagnier and members of his group at the Pasteur Institute, notably including Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Jean-Claude Chermann, had extensive experience with retroviruses. Montagnier and his team examined samples taken from Rozenbaum’s AIDS patients and found the virus that would later become known as HIV in a lymph node biopsy. They named it “lymphadenopathy-associated virus”, or LAV, since it was not then clear that it was the cause of AIDS, and published their findings in the journal Science on 20 May 1983.[6]

A team led by Robert Gallo of the United States published similar findings in the same issue of Science and later confirmed the discovery of the virus and presented evidence that it caused AIDS. Gallo called the virus “human T-lymphotropic virus type III” (HTLV-III) because of perceived similarities with HTLV-I and -II, which had previously been discovered in his lab.[7] Because of the timing of the discoveries, whether Montagnier’s or Gallo’s group was first to isolate HIV was for many years the subject of an acrimonious dispute. HIV isolates usually have a high degree of variability because the virus mutates rapidly. In comparison, the first two-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates, Lai/LAV (formerly LAV, isolated at the Pasteur Institute) and Lai/IIIB (formerly HTLV-IIIB, isolated from a pooled culture at the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology (LTCB) of the National Cancer Institute) were strikingly similar in sequence, suggesting that the two isolates were in fact the same, or at least shared a common source.

In November 1990, the Office of Scientific Integrity at the National Institutes of Health attempted to clear up the matter by commissioning a group at Roche to analyze archival samples established at the Pasteur Institute and the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology (LTCB) of the National Cancer Institute between 1983 and 1985. The group, led by Sheng-Yung Chang, examined archival specimens and concluded in Nature in 1993 that Gallo’s virus had come from Montagnier’s lab.

Chang determined that the French group’s LAV was a virus from one patient that had contaminated a culture from another. On request, Montagnier’s group had sent a sample of this culture to Gallo, not knowing it contained two viruses. It then contaminated the pooled culture on which Gallo was working.[8]

Before the 1993 publication of Chang’s results, Gallo’s lab was accused and initially found guilty of “minor misconduct” by the Office of Scientific Integrity in 1991, and then by the newly created Office of Research Integrity in 1992 for the misappropriation of a sample of HIV produced at the Pasteur Institute.[9] The subsequent publication in 1993 of Chang’s investigation cleared Gallo’s lab of the charges, although his reputation had already been tainted by the accusations.

Today it is agreed that Montagnier’s group first isolated HIV,[10] but Gallo’s group is credited with discovering that the virus causes AIDS and with generating much of the science that made the discovery possible, including a technique previously developed by Gallo’s lab for growing T cells in the laboratory.[11] When Montagnier’s group first published their discovery, they said HIV’s role in causing AIDS “remains to be determined.”[12]

The question of whether the true discoverers of the virus were French or American was more than a matter of prestige. A US government patent for the AIDS test, filed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and based on what was claimed to be Gallo’s identification of the virus, was at stake. In 1987, both governments attempted to end the dispute by arranging to split the prestige of the discovery and the proceeds from the patent 50–50,[13] naming Montagnier and Gallo co-discoverers.[12] The two scientists continued to dispute each other’s claims until 1987.

It was not until French President François Mitterrand and American President Ronald Reagan met in person that the major issues were ironed out. The scientific protagonists finally agreed to share credit for the discovery of HIV, and in 1986, both the French and the US names (LAV and HTLV-III) were dropped in favor of the new term human immunodeficiency virus (virus de l’immunodéficience humaine, abbreviated HIV or VIH) (Coffin, 1986). They concluded that the origin of the HIV-1 Lai/IIIB isolate discovered by Gallo was the same as that discovered by Montagnier (but not known by Montagnier to cause AIDS). This compromise allowed Montagnier and Gallo to end their feud and collaborate with each other again, writing a chronology that appeared in Nature that year.[12]

On 29 November 2002 issue of Science, Gallo and Montagnier published a series of articles, one of which was co-written by both scientists, in which they acknowledged the pivotal roles that each had played in the discovery of HIV.[14][15][16]

Awards and honors[edit]

The 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Montagnier and Françoise Barré-Sinoussi for the discovery of HIV.[17] They shared the Prize with Harald zur Hausen, who discovered that human papilloma viruses can cause cervical cancer.[12][18] Montagnier said he was “surprised” that Robert Gallo was not also recognized by the Nobel Committee: “It was important to prove that HIV was the cause of AIDS, and Gallo had a very important role in that. I’m very sorry for Robert Gallo.”[12] According to Maria Masucci, a member of the Nobel Assembly, “there was no doubt as to who made the fundamental discoveries.”[17]

Montagnier is the co-founder of the World Foundation for AIDS Research and Prevention and co-directs the Program for International Viral Collaboration. He is the founder and a former president of the Houston-based World Foundation for Medical Research and Prevention. He has received more than 20 major awards, including the National Order of Merit (Commander, 1986) and the Légion d’honneur (Knight: 1984; Officer: 1990; Commander: 1993; Grand Officer: 2009),[19][20] He is a recipient of the Lasker Award and the Scheele Award (1986), the Louis-Jeantet Prize for medicine (1986), the Gairdner Award (1987), the Golden Plate Award of the American Academy of Achievement (1987),[21] King Faisal International Prize (1993) (known as the Arab Nobel Prize), and the Prince of Asturias Award (2000). He is also a member of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.[22]

Montagnier was awarded the honorary Doctor of Humane Letters (L.H.D.) from Whittier College in 2010.[23]

Research on electromagnetic signals from DNA[edit]

Unbalanced scales.svg

This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (January 2019)

Main article: DNA teleportation

In 2009, Montagnier published two independently made, controversial research studies, one of which was entitled “Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences.” Jeff Reimers of the University of Sydney said that, if its conclusions are true, “these would be the most significant experiments performed in the past 90 years, demanding re-evaluation of the whole conceptual framework of modern chemistry”.[24] The paper concludes that diluted DNA from pathogenic bacterial and viral species is able to emit specific radio waves” and that “these radio waves [are] associated with ‘nanostructures’ in the solution that might be able to recreate the pathogen”.

They were published in a new journal of which he is chairman of the editorial board,[25] allegedly[24] detecting electromagnetic signals from bacterial DNA (M. pirum and E. coli) in water that had been prepared using agitation and high dilutions,[26] and similar research on electromagnetic detection of HIV RNA in the blood of AIDS patients treated by antiretroviral therapy.[27]

On 28 June 2010, Montagnier spoke at the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting in Germany,[28] “where 60 Nobel prize winners had gathered, along with 700 other scientists, to discuss the latest breakthroughs in medicine, chemistry and physics.”[29] He “stunned his colleagues … when he presented a new method for detecting viral infections that bore close parallels to the basic tenets of homeopathy. Although fellow Nobel prize winners – who view homeopathy as quackery – were left openly shaking their heads, Montagnier’s comments were rapidly embraced by homeopaths eager for greater credibility. Cristal Sumner, of the British Homeopathic Association, said Montagnier’s work gave homeopathy ‘a true scientific ethos’.”[29]

When asked by Canada’s CBC Marketplace program if his work was indeed a theoretical basis for homeopathy as homeopaths had claimed, Montagnier replied that one “cannot extrapolate it to the products used in homeopathy”.[30]

Responses, criticisms and interview[edit]

The paper has met with harsh criticism for not being peer-reviewed, and its claims unsubstantiated by modern mainstream conventions of physics and chemistry. No third party has replicated the findings as of March 2015. In response to Montagnier’s statement that the generally unfavorable response is due to the “non-understanding or misunderstanding of the breakthrough findings”, blogger Andy Lewis has written that he has found it difficult to assert what the paper “actually claims” and that “The paper […] lacks any rigour. […]”, as “important experimental steps are described dismissively in a sentence and little attempt is made to describe the detail of the work”.[31] While homeopaths claim his research as support for homeopathy, many scientists have greeted it with scorn and harsh criticism.[24][32][33]

Because the research used high dilutions, homeopaths claimed it supported homeopathy, even though it didn’t mention homeopathy:

On 14 September 2009, Louise Mclean posted on the “Homeopathy World Community” website: “Luc Montagnier Foundation Proves Homeopathy Works”,[34] and on 6 October 2009, homeopathic promoter Dana Ullman responded to a criticism of homeopathy by writing: “And I assume that you all have seen the new research by Nobel Prize-winning virologist Luc Montagnier that provides significant support to homeopathy.”[35] (On 30 January 2011, Ullman responded to Montagnier’s comment on “homeopathy” and “high dilutions” in his 24 December 2010 Science interview by writing an article entitled “Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner, Takes Homeopathy Seriously”. In the article he repeated his claim’s that Montagnier’s studies supported homeopathy.[36])

Criticism of the claims of homeopaths followed:

On 20 October 2010, Harriet A. Hall responded specifically to these claims by homeopaths: “Nope. Sorry, guys. It doesn’t. In fact, its findings are inconsistent with homeopathic theory… Homeopaths who believe Montagnier’s study supports homeopathy are only demonstrating their enormous capacity for self-deception.” She went on to analyze the studies and pointed out a number of flaws, stating: “…even assuming the results are valid, they tend to discredit homeopathy, not support it… Homeopathy is a system of clinical treatment that can only be validated by in vivo clinical trials.”[37]

In a 24 December 2010 Science magazine interview entitled “French Nobelist Escapes ‘Intellectual Terror’ to Pursue Radical Ideas in China”, he was questioned about his research and plans. In the interview he stated that Jacques Benveniste, whose controversial homeopathic work had been discredited, was “a modern Galileo“. When asked if he wasn’t “worried that your colleagues will think you have drifted into pseudo-science?”, he replied “No, because it’s not pseudoscience. It’s not quackery. These are real phenomena which deserve further study.” He also mentioned that his applications for funding had been turned down and that he was leaving his home country to set up shop in China so he could escape what he called the “intellectual terror” which he claimed had prevented others from publishing their results. He says that China’s Shanghai Jiao Tong University is more “open minded” to his research. There he is chairman of the editorial board[25] of a new journal which publishes his research.[38]

Montagnier was also questioned on his beliefs about homeopathy, to which he replied: “I can’t say that homeopathy is right in everything. What I can say now is that the high dilutions are right. High dilutions of something are not nothing. They are water structures which mimic the original molecules. We find that with DNA, we cannot work at the extremely high dilutions used in homeopathy; we cannot go further than a 10−18 dilution, or we lose the signal. But even at 10−18, you can calculate that there is not a single molecule of DNA left. And yet we detect a signal.”[38]

A 12 January 2011 New Scientist editorial described the controversial nature of the research, while also noting how many researchers “reacted with disbelief”, with Gary Schuster comparing it to “pathological science.”[24] Biology professor PZ Myers also described it as “pathological science.” He described the paper as “one of the more unprofessional write-ups I’ve ever run across”, and criticized the publication process as having an “unbelievable turnaround” time: “another suspicious sign are the dates. This paper was submitted on 3 January 2009, revised on 5 January 2009, and accepted on 6 January 2009”, leading him to ask: “Who reviewed this, the author’s mother? Maybe someone even closer. Guess who the chairman of the editorial board is: Luc Montagnier.”[32]

On 25 May 2012, he gave the keynote address[39] at the 2012 AutismOne conference in Chicago. Similar to the controversy he aroused by extolling homeopathy, his latest group, Chronimed, claims to have made a discovery for autistic children that was sharply criticized[40] by scientist Steven Salzberg.

Legal battle over patent[edit]

In 2009, Montagnier became involved in a legal battle with inventor Bruno Robert over the intellectual property rights to the techniques used in the aforementioned research. Robert, who had tried to succeed the company Digibio created by Jacques Benveniste, approached Montagnier in May 2005 regarding his work on electromagnetic signals. In November 2005, Robert registered a patent for the process of homing in on a “biochemical element presenting a biological activity through the analysis of low-frequency electromagnetic signals.” This patent was in fact written by Montagnier from results obtained between July and November 2005.[citation needed] A month later, INPI, France’s patents body, received a request for the same patent from Montagnier,[41] which was criticized by the patent examiner on multiple points, including the following:

“… the invention is based on phenomena which contradict the fundamental principle of physics and of chemistry, i.e. the existence of biological or effect without an active molecule and no explanation or theoretical basis makes it impossible at the current time to explain the results obtained.”[42]

Montagnier took Robert to court, claiming that he had intellectual property rights over this process. However, Robert’s lawyer alleged that Montagnier had already admitted that he had not come up with the discovery, as he had signed a contract to use Robert’s technique in 2005. In response, Montagnier’s lawyer said the pair had only signed a “protocol agreement” which was not legally binding.[43] In July 2009, the court ruled that Robert’s 2005 patent application was ‘fraudulent’, because it had subtracted all of Montagnier’s contribution, which the court estimated at 50%.[44]

Coronavirus pandemic[edit]

Montagnier argued that the Coronavirus disease 2019 was man-made in a laboratory and that it might have been the result of an attempt to create a vaccine for HIV/AIDS. His allegation came after the United States had launched a probe into whether the virus came from a laboratory. According to Montagnier, the “presence of elements of HIV and germ of malaria in the genome of coronavirus is highly suspect and the characteristics of the virus could not have arisen naturally.”[45] However this was described as “a conspiracy vision that does not relate to the real science” by Jean-Francois Delfraissy, an immunologist and head of the scientific council that advises the French government on the COVID-19 pandemic.[46]

See also[edit]

And the Band Played On, a book written about the discovery of AIDS

And the Band Played On, a film based on the book

History of RNA biology

HIV trial in Libya

List of RNA biologists

References[edit]

^ Louis-Jeantet Prize

^ “Montagnier”. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Retrieved 10 August 2019.

^ “Montagnier”. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 10 August 2019.

^ “news.bbc.co.uk, Nobel prize for viral discoveries”. BBC News. 6 October 2008. Retrieved 15 May 2012.

^ “SJTU Appointed Luc Montagnier University Chair Professor”. En.sjtu.edu.cn. Retrieved 15 May 2012.

^ Barré-Sinoussi F, Chermann JC, Rey F, Nugeyre MT, Chamaret S, Gruest J, Dauguet C, Axler-Blin C, Vézinet-Brun F, Rouzioux C, Rozenbaum W, Montagnier L (1983). “Isolation of a T-lymphotropic retrovirus from a patient at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)”. Science. 220 (4599): 868–871. Bibcode:1983Sci…220..868B. doi:10.1126/science.6189183. PMID 6189183. S2CID 390173.

^ Popovic M, Sarngadharan MG, Read E, Gallo RC (1984). “Detection, isolation, and continuous production of cytopathic retroviruses (HTLV-III) from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS”. Science. 224 (4648): 497–500. Bibcode:1984Sci…224..497P. doi:10.1126/science.6200935. PMID 6200935.

^ Sheng-Yung P. Chang; Barbara H. Bowman; Judith B. Weiss; Rebeca E. Garcia; Thomas J. White (1993). “The origin of HIV-1 isolate HTLV-IIIB”. Nature. 363 (6428): 466–469. Bibcode:1993Natur.363..466C. doi:10.1038/363466a0. PMID 8502298. S2CID 4288880.(Open access)

^ “Summary of fraud accusation”. Ori.hhs.gov. Retrieved 15 May 2012.

^ Enserink, Martin. “Nobel Prize Surprise – ScienceNOW”. Sciencenow.sciencemag.org. Retrieved 15 May 2012.

^ DA Morgan; FW Ruscetti; R Gallo (10 September 1976). “Selective in vitro growth of T lymphocytes from normal human bone marrows”. Science. Sciencemag.org. 193 (4257): 1007–1008. Bibcode:1976Sci…193.1007M. doi:10.1126/science.181845. PMID 181845. Retrieved 15 May 2012.

^ Jump up to:a b c d e “HIV, HPV Researchers Honored, But One Scientist is Left Out”. Science. 322. October 2008. pp. 149–328.

^ Hilts, Philip (13 November 1993). “U.S. Drops Misconduct Case Against an AIDS Researcher”. New York Times.

^ Montagnier L (2002). “Historical essay. A History of HIV Discovery”. Science. 298 (5599): 1727–8. doi:10.1126/science.1079027. PMID 12459575. S2CID 57481800.

^ Gallo RC (2002). “Historical essay. The Early Years of HIV/AIDS”. Science. 298 (5599): 1728–30. doi:10.1126/science.1078050. PMID 12459576. S2CID 82899411.

^ Gallo RC, Montagnier L (2002). “Historical essay. Prospects for the Future”. Science. 298 (5599): 1730–1. doi:10.1126/science.1079864. PMID 12459577. S2CID 34227893.

^ Jump up to:a b Altman, Lawrence K. (7 October 2008). “Discoverers of AIDS and Cancer Viruses Win Nobel”. The New York Times. Retrieved 11 May 2010.

^ Altman, Lawrence (6 October 2008). “Three Europeans Win the 2008 Nobel for Medicine”. New York Times. Retrieved 6 October 2008.

^ “Décret du 31 décembre 2008 portant élévation et nomination aux dignités de grand’croix et de grand officier”. JORF. 2009 (1): 14. 1 January 2009. PREX0828225D. Retrieved 10 March 2009.

^ “montagnier.org”. montagnier.org. Retrieved 21 March 2018.

^ “Golden Plate Awardees of the American Academy of Achievement”. www.achievement.org. American Academy of Achievement.

^ [1]

^ “Honorary Degrees | Whittier College”. www.whittier.edu. Retrieved 6 December 2019.

^ Jump up to:a b c d Andy Coghlan, “Scorn over claim of teleported DNA”, New Scientist 12 January 2011, issue 2795

^ Jump up to:a b Montagnier is listed as Chairman of the Editorial Board of the journal Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences

^ Montagnier, L, Aäissa, J et al, “Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences”. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 6 January 2009, Volume 1, Number 2, 81–90, doi:10.1007/s12539-009-0036-7 Retrieved 27 January 2011.

^ Montagnier, L, Aäissa, J et al, “Electromagnetic detection of HIV DNA in the blood of AIDS patients treated by antiretroviral therapy”. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 3 July 2009, Volume 1, Number 4, 245–253, doi:10.1007/s12539-009-0059-0Retrieved 27 January 2011

^ Program (2010 – 60th Meeting of Nobel Laureates (3rd interdisciplinary)) Archived 17 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine, Meeting on 28 June 2010

^ Jump up to:a b Nobel laureate gives homeopathy a boost. The Australian 5 July 2010

^ “Cure Or Con?”. CBC Marketplace. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Approx 17:00 of 22:29.

^ Lewis, A, et al, “Why I am Nominating Luc Montagnier for an IgNobel Prize”. Retrieved 3 March 2015.

^ Jump up to:a b PZ Myers, “It almost makes me disbelieve that HIV causes AIDS!”, Pharyngula, 24 January 2011

^ Editorial, “Why we have to teleport disbelief”, New Scientist 12 January 2011, issue 2795

^ “Luc Montagnier Foundation Proves Homeopathy Works”. “Homeopathy World Community” website, 14 September 2009

^ Dana Ullman, Dana Ullman’s comment of 6 October 2009

^ Dana Ullman, “Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner, Takes Homeopathy Seriously”, Huffington Post, 30 January 2011

^ Harriet A. Hall, “The Montagnier ‘Homeopathy’ Study”, Science-Based Medicine, 20 October 2009

^ Jump up to:a b Martin Enserink, “Newsmaker Interview: Luc Montagnier. French Nobelist Escapes “Intellectual Terror” to Pursue Radical Ideas in China”, Science 24 December 2010: 1732. doi:10.1126/science.330.6012.1732 Full article mirror

^ Announcement of public appearance, “Keynote: The microbial track”, 25 May 2012

^ Editorial, “Nobel laureate joins anti-vaccination crowd at Autism One”, Forbes 27 May 2012

^ “Montagnier’s patent application”. V3.espacenet.com. Retrieved 15 May 2012.

^ Patent examiner’s assessment, p. 10[permanent dead link]. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), United Nations

^ Samuel, Henry (8 March 2009). “Man who co-discovered HIV accused of stealing rights to Aids cure”. The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 4 August 2009.

^ http://www.lematin.ch/flash-info/luc-montagnier-gagne-proces-paternite-brevets-contre-bruno-robert Archived 18 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine

^ { Perez, J. C., & Montagnier, L. (2020). COVID-19, SARS AND BATS CORONAVIRUSES GENOMES PECULIAR HOMOLOGOUS RNA SEQUENCES. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(7), 217-263. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i7.2020.678 and https://zenodo.org/record/3975578 }

^ “COVID-19 virus not created in lab, say French experts”. Retrieved 25 April 2020.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Luc Montagnier.

https://seemorerocks.is/luc-montangier-we-must-be-ready-to-incinerate-the-bodies/