## Friday, July 31, 2020

### Gold all time high was on 8.22.11

8+22+20+11= 61
8+22+2+0+1+1 = 34
8+2+2+2+0+1+1 = 16
8+22+11= 41

Mon, 22 August 2011 = 22nd of Av, 5771
כ״ב בְּאָב תשע״א
Parashat Re'eh

22/11/5771
22+11+57+71 = 161
22+11+5+7+7+1= 53
2+2+1+1+5+7+7+1= 26

22/5/5771
22+5+57+71= 155
2+2+5+57+71= 137
2+2+5+5+7+7+1= 29
22+5+71= 98

From and including: Monday, August 22, 2011
To, but not including Saturday, August 22, 2020
Result: 3288 days
Or 9 years excluding the end date.
Or 108 months excluding the end date.

108: The Number that Unifies The Big Picture with The Present Moment
If there were to be a numerical symbol of yoga it would have to be 108. The number…

If there were to be a numerical symbol of yoga it would have to be 108. The number is esteemed esoterically, and through 108, the union between the microcosm and macrocosm is depicted concretely.

The importance of the number 108 can be seen repetitively in astronomy and astrology:

In Vedic astrology there are 12 solar houses and 9 lunar houses, 9 x 12 = 108.
The diameter of the sun is about 108 times that of the diameter of Earth.
The average distance between the Earth and the Sun is 108 times the sun’s diameter.
The average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 238,800 miles, about 108 times the moons diameter.  This makes it so the moon appears the same size as the sun during eclipses.
To quote Manoj Chalam, “the ratio of 108 may be the key to finding planets hospitable to life outside of our solar system, just look toward this same size and distance relationship,” 108 is key to our being.
In taking this universal element and applying it to the individual, you may notice that:

Yogis do 108 sun salutations on solstices and equinoxes
Meditators count mantra repetitions with mala beads of 108, (100 counted for self, 8 for mistakes and for those who have not the opportunity to meditate in mantra)
Tai chi chuan long forms are counted as 108 postures or movements.

### Frontline Doctors whitepaper

Frontline Doctors got their website back up. They put their white paper on Hydroxychloroquine there it anybody needs it....

White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine
View the PDF

This is the culmination of months-long research from all sources. It explains how Americans have come to be in the grip of fear. All the myths and all the misconceptions about a safe, generic drug that has been FDA approved for 65 years, given to pregnant women, breastfeeding women, children, the elderly and the immune-compromised for years and decades without complication, are finally put in the trash heap where they belong. You will have the indisputable proof that you have been massively lied to, often very intentionally. At first you will first be heartbroken. And then you will be furious. Good. Because then you will demand change.

Compendium of HCQ Studies
View the PDF

The safety of HCQ is irrefutable. The evidence supporting HCQ efficacy against Covid-19 is also overwhelming. All negative HCQ studies have used either: too much, used it alone (it needs Zinc), or used it late (it should be early.) The treatment dose is 200 mg HCQ twice a day for five days + Zinc 50 (elemental) daily. The prophylactic dose is 400 mg HCQ weekly + Zinc 50 (elemental) daily. (There are studies right now to see if HCQ 200 mg. weekly is sufficient.) This is very low dose. (The usual dose of HCQ in Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis is 400 mg. daily for years.) There are telemedicine physicians who are aware of the facts and if you are concerned about this, please see one. It is also over the counter in many places in the world including Indonesia and most of South America.

https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/references/

### Epstein redacted....

If you copy the reacted parts of the Epstein files and paste them on notepad they come up....

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0_2.pdf

During her recent deposition,
to Jeffrey Epstein. Because this activity is highly relevant to this case, Defendant should be
As the Court is aware, this defamation case involves Ms. Giuffre’s assertions that she and
other females were recruited by Defendant to be sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein under the
guise of being “massage therapists.” See Complaint, (DE 1), at ¶ 27 (Giuffre “described
Maxwell’s role as one of the main women who Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for
sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator and participant in his sexual abuse and sex
trafficking scheme”). In response to these assertions, Defendant has made the sweeping claim
that Ms. Giuffre’s assertions are “entirely false” and “entirely untrue.” Complaint, DE 1, at ¶ 31.

Yet during her deposition, Defendant refused to answer any questions that she construed
as having something to do with “consensual adult sex.” Defense counsel supported that position
Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley (“McCawley Decl.”) at Exhibit 1, Tr. of Maxwell Depo.
(Apr. 22, 2016) at 21. The result was that at a number of points throughout her deposition,
Defendant refused to answer questions about subjects integral to this lawsuit, including questions
about what the alleged “massage therapists” were doing at Jeffrey Epstein’s house and the sexual
nature of those massages.
Epstein a massage:
Q. Have you ever given Jeffrey Epstein a massage?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the form, foundation. And I'm going to
instruct you not to answer that question. I don't have any problem with you
asking questions about what the subject matter of this lawsuit is, which would
be, as you've termed it, sexual trafficking of Ms. Roberts.
To the extent you are asking for information relating to any consensual
adult interaction between my client and Mr. Epstein, I'm going to instruct her not
to answer because it's not part of this litigation and it is her private confidential
information, not subject to this deposition.
MS. McCAWLEY: You can instruct her not to answer. That is your
right. But I will bring her back for another deposition because it is part of the
subject matter of this litigation so she should be answering these questions. This
is civil litigation, deposition and she should be responsible for answering these
questions.
MR. PAGLIUCA: I disagree and you understand the bounds that I put on
it.
MS. McCAWLEY: No, I don't. I will continue to ask my questions and
you can continue to make your objections.
Q. Did you ever participate from the time period of 1992 to 2009, did
you ever participate in a massage with Jeffrey Epstein and another female?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection. Do not answer that question. Again, to the
extent you are asking for some sort of illegal activity as you've construed in

connection with this case I don't have any problem with you asking that question.
To the extent these questions involve consensual acts between adults, frankly,
MS. McCAWLEY: This case involves sexual trafficking, sexual abuse,
questions about her having interactions with other females is relevant to this case.
She needs to answer these questions.
MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm instructing her not to answer.
MS. McCAWLEY: Then we will be back here again.
See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 2, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 19-22 (emphasis
Defendant’s participation in massages with Epstein is a central part of this case. Ms.
Giuffre has explained that during her first sexual encounter with Jeffrey Epstein, it was
Defendant who provided instruction on how to do it and how to turn the massage into a sexual
event. Obviously, proof that Defendant had previously massaged Epstein – include massages
with sexual component – would provide important corroboration for Ms. Giuffre’s testimony at
trial. And proof that Defendant was involved in massages will further help prove that
statements to the press that Virginia’s allegations were “obvious lies” was itself an obvious lie.
As another example, Defendant refused to answer questions about her knowledge that
Johanna Sjoberg was hired to work for Epstein and provided massages. In the police report,
Johanna admitted that Maxwell recruited her to work for Epstein. See McCawley Decl. at
Exhibit 3, Giuffre000076-77 (police report indicating that Johanna was recruited by Maxwell).
Yet during Defendant’s deposition, she refused to answer questions regarding Johanna Sjoberg.
Q. Do you know what tasks Johanna was hired to performance?
Q. Did you ever ask her to rub Jeffrey's feet? . . .
A. I believe that I have read that, but I don't have any memory of it.

Q. Did you ever tell Johanna that she would get extra money if she
provided Jeffrey massages?
A. I was always happy to give career advice to people and I think that
becoming somebody in the healthcare profession, either exercise instructor or
nutritionist or professional massage therapist is an excellent job opportunity.
Hourly wages are around 7, 8, \$9 and as a professional healthcare provider you
can earn somewhere between as we have established 100 to \$200 and to be able to
travel and have a job that pays that is a wonderful job opportunity. So in the
context of advising people for opportunities for work, it is possible that I would
have said that she should explore that as an option.
Q. Did you tell her she would get extra money if she massaged Jeffrey?
A. I'm just saying, I cannot recall the exact conversation. I give career
advice and I have done that.
Q. Did you ever have Johanna massage you?
A. I did.
Q. How many times?
A. I don't recall how many times.
Q. Was there sex involved?
A. No. . . .
Q. Did you ever have sexual contact with Johanna?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the form and foundation. You need to give
me an opportunity to get in between the questions.
Anything that involves consensual sex on your part, I'm instructing you
Q. Did you ever have sexual contact with Johanna?
A. [MR. PAGLIUCA?] Again, she is an adult --
Q. I’m asking you, did you ever have sexual contact with Johanna?
A. I’ve just been instructed not to answer.
Q. On what basis?
A. You have to ask my lawyer.
See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 4, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 60-62 (emphasis

Here again, this information is critical to the case. Among other things, these questions
are designed to show a modus operani (“M.O”) for Epstein and Maxwell – specifically, how they
recruited for a non-sexual massage than converted the massage into sexual activities.
One last illustration comes from Defendant’s refusal to answer about her knowledge of
Epstein’s sexual interests during massages:
Q. Does Jeffrey like to have his nipples pinched during sexual
encounters?
MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form and foundation.
A. I'm not referring to any advice on my counsel. I'm not talking about
any adult sexual things when I was with him.
Q. When Jeffrey would have a massage, would he request that the
masseuse pinch his nipples while he was having a massage?
See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 5, Tr. of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 82.
While Epstein himself might also provide answers to these questions, it appears likely
that he will assert his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding his sexual activities. Accordingly,
Ms. Giuffre must pursue questioning of Maxwell to obtain information on this subject. Here
again, information about Epstein’s sexual idiosyncrasies will provide important corroboration to
Ms. Giuffre’s testimony that she had sexual interactions of an identical nature with Epstein.
These refusals are not an isolated instance. Instead, similar refusals to answer questions
occurred repeatedly throughout the deposition. See, e.g., McCawley Decl. at Composite Exhibit
6. 52-55; 64-65; 82; 92-93; 137-38; 307-09.
The Court should compel Defendant to answer all these questions. In addition to the
specific points made above, the “big picture” here reveals how vital such discovery is. At the
core of Ms. Giuffre’s allegations is the allegation that Defendant lured her into a sexual situation
with the offer of a job making money as a massage therapist; that Epstein always habitually tried

to turn massages into sex (that was his modus operandi and plan all along); and that Maxwell
recruited other females for an ostensibly proper position, such as therapeutic masseuse, with
knowledge that the intent was for that person would be pressured to provide sexual gratification
to Epstein. As a result, Epstein’s use of massages for sexual purposes is a central part of this
case.
And Defendant’s role in those massages – and knowledge of the purposes of those
massages – is a critical piece of evidence showing her state of mind when she attacked Ms.
Giuffre’s assertions as “entirely untrue.” Ms. Giuffre intends to prove at trial that Defendant
knew full well the sexual purpose for which she was recruiting females – including underage
females like Ms. Giuffre. Ms. Giuffre is entitled to explore Defendant’s knowledge of the sexual
activities that took place under the guise of “massages.” Otherwise Defendant will be able to
portray to the jury an inaccurate picture of that what was happening at Epstein’s house what
nothing more than run-of-the-mill massage therapy. See, e.g., McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 7, Tr.
of Maxwell Depo. (Apr. 22, 2016) at 51 (“Q: Did [the pay for massage therapists] vary on what
sexual acts they performed? . . . A: No, it varied depending on how much time, some massage
therapists charge more and some charge less.”).
Ms. Giuffre from seeking legitimate discovery in this case. By refusing to answer questions
about her and Epstein’s sexual activities with alleged “adults,” Defendant is essentially given the
ability to refuse to answer any sexual question she does not wish to answer. Defendant simply
has to deem the question as involving “consensual adult sex” and no need be given. The result is
to leave Ms. Giuffre with no way of exploring the identity of these alleged adults, the ages of
these alleged adults, and indeed whether they were adults at all. This allows Defendant to claim

that she is unaware of any sexual activity involving underage females, because (she claims) the
only sexual activity she was aware involved adults.
The Court should compel Ms. Maxwell to answer all questions about her knowledge
relating to sexual activities with Epstein and other females while at Epstein’s various homes. See
Fed. R. Crim. P. 37(a)(3)(B)(i); see, e.g., Kelly v. A1 Tech., No. 09 CIV. 962 LAK MHD, 2010
WL 1541585, at *20 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2010) (“Under the Federal Rules, when a party refuses
to answer a question during a deposition, the questioning party may subsequently move to
compel disclosure of the testimony that it sought. The court must determine the propriety of the
deponent's objection to answering the questions, and can order the deponent to provide
improperly withheld answers during a continued deposition” (internal citations omitted)). Of
course, the party objecting to discovery must carry the burden of proving the validity of its
objections, particularly in light of “the broad and liberal construction afforded the federal
discovery rules . . . .” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLC, 298 F.R.D. 184, 186
(S.D.N.Y. 2014). For purposes of a deposition, the information sought “need not be admissible
at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence.” Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 293 F.R.D. 557, 561 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1)).
Defendant cannot carry her burden of showing that the questions asked are not
reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This is a case in which
sexual activities lie at the heart of the issues in dispute. As a result, it is hardly surprising to find
that discovery pertains to alleged “adult” sexual activities – and questions about such subjects are
entirely proper. See, e.g., Condit v. Dunne, 225 F.R.D. 100, 113 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (in defamation
case, “Plaintiff is hereby ordered to answer questions regarding his sexual relationships in so far

as they are relevant to a defense of substantial truth, mitigation of damages, or impeachment of
plaintiff.”); Weber v. Multimedia Entm't, Inc., No. 97 CIV. 0682 PKL THK, 1997 WL 729039, at
*3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 1997) (“While discovery is not unlimited and may not unnecessarily
intrude into private matters, in the instant case inquiry into private matters is clearly relevant to
the subject matter of the suit. Accordingly, plaintiff Misty Weber shall respond to defendants'
interrogatories concerning her sexual partners . . . .”).
Generally speaking, instructions from attorneys to their clients not to answer questions at
a deposition should be “limited to [issues regarding] privilege.” Morales v. Zondo, Inc., 204
F.R.D. 50, 54 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). In this case, defense counsel ranged far beyond the normal
parameters of objections and sought to decide for himself what issues were relevant. That was
improper and the Court should order a resumption of the Defendant’s deposition so that she can
answer questions about her knowledge of sexual activity relating to Jeffrey Epstein.

Defendant should be ordered to sit for a follow-up deposition and directed to answer
questions regarding her knowledge of alleged “adult” sexual activity.

## Thursday, July 30, 2020

### Trump tower inauguration to Trump inauguration #33 #120 #119 #1214

Trump was the 58th person to run for President. Trump Tower is 58 stories high.
"Freemasonry" = 58 (Full Reduction)
"depopulation" = 58 (Full Reduction)

"Donald J Trump" = 148 (English Ordinal)
"depopulation" = 148 (English Ordinal)
"Donald J Trump" = 176 (Reverse Ordinal)
"depopulation" = 176 (Reverse Ordinal)

"depopulation virus" = 222 (Reverse Ordinal)
From 9/11/2001 to 3/11/2020 was 222 months
From and including: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
To, but not including Wednesday, March 11, 2020
222 months
"event two zero one" = 222 (English Ordinal)
"Hell" = 222 (English Sumerian)

Front of the Rothschild coat of arms....
"concordia integritas industria" = 1214 (Jewish)
"All Seeing Eye Of The Illuminati" = 1214 (Jewish)
"Jachin Boaz" = 1214 (Jewish)

### Scientific American " We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe

The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks

By Joel M. Moskowitz on October 17, 2019

The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of "fear mongering" over the advent of wireless technology's 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.

Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.

Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”

The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.

The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior.

The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in 2011. Last year, a \$30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats.

### "CIA document the effects of 5G" #5G #CIA #nurse

A declassified paper on the effects of cell phone radiation

### #nurse The Silencing of Dr. Judy Mikovits with Guests Dr. Judy Mikovits, Kent Heckenlively & Larry Klayman 7/30/20

#nurse The Silencing of Dr. Judy Mikovits with Guests Dr. Judy Mikovits, Kent Heckenlively & Larry Klayman 7/30/20

Dr. Judy Mikovits has quickly become the most suppressed scientist in the world, but why?  She joins me along with the co-author of her new book Plague of Corruption, Kent Heckenlively and attroney Larry Klayman to discuss the latest round of false accusations against her.

## Wednesday, July 29, 2020

### Cat coronavirus on 7/22 in the UK

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/27/uk/cat-coronavirus-covid19-uk-intl-gbr/index.html

From Simpsons "Apocalypse Meow" to cat in UK diagnosed on PI day...

From and including: Sunday, November 21, 2010
To, but not including Wednesday, July 22, 2020
Result: 3531 days
3531/29.531 = 119.56 lunar months
"all seeing eye" = 119 (English Ordinal)
"coronavirus" = 56 (Full Reduction)
"all seeing eye" = 56 (Full Reduction)
"apocalypse" = 113 (English Ordinal) 3/11
Or 9 years, 8 months, 1 day excluding the end date.
Or 116 months, 1 day excluding the end date.
504 weeks and 3 days
967.40% of a common year (365 days)

To year of the tiger
From and including: Sunday, November 21, 2010
To, but not including Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Result: 4090 days
4090/27.322=149.696
4090/29.531= 138.49
Or 11 years, 2 months, 11 days excluding the end date.
Or 134 months, 11 days excluding the end date.
584 weeks and 2 days
1120.55% of a common year (365 days)

From and including: Wednesday, July 22, 2020
To and including: Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Result: 560 days
Or 1 year, 6 months, 11 days including the end date.
Or 18 months, 11 days including the end date.
80 weeks
153.42% of a common year (365 days)

https://simpsonswiki.com/wiki/The_Fool_Monty

Nancy Pelosi makes masks manditory on 7/29 Tishabav Eve #811 #911 #211 #155

Nancy Pelosi imposes mandatory mask policy for House floor after GOP Rep. Gohmert tests positive for coronavirus

PUBLISHED WED, JUL 29 2020 6:14 PM

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Wednesday imposed a mandatory mask policy for the floor of the House.

Pelosi first revealed the new rule during a call with senior Democrats shortly before announcing it in the House chamber, a source on the call told CNBC.

The new policy comes just hours after Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert announced that he had tested positive for the coronavirus.

July 29 is the 210th day of the year (211th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. 155 days remain until the end of the year.

211 ordinal
ritual human sacrifice
six hundred sixty six
the Apprentice
sixty six books
Satanic rituals
Partial Solar Eclipse
Holocaust Remembrance

211 Jewish
black pope
Cell phone

"coronavirus" = 155 (English Ordinal)

Wed, 29 July 2020 = 8th of Av, 5780
ח׳ בְּאָב תש״פ
Erev Tish'a B'Av
Parashat Vaetchanan

Thu, 30 July 2020 = 9th of Av, 5780
ט׳ בְּאָב תש״פ
Tish'a B'Av
Parashat Vaetchanan

### They're going to put something really NASTY in our food. It will be in plants and seeds too!!!!!!!!! HYDROGEL....

They're going to put something really NASTY in our food. It will be in plants and seeds too!!!!!!!!! HYDROGEL....

Conductive Hydrogel Journal of Agricultural Science

Conductive Hydrogels—A Novel Material: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Abstract

A conductive hydrogel is a kind of polymer material having substantial potential applications with various properties, including high toughness, self-recoverability, electrical conductivity, transparency, freezing resistance, stimuli responsiveness, stretchability, self-healing, and strain sensitivity. Herein, according to the current research status of conductive hydrogels, properties of conductive hydrogels, preparation methods of different conductive hydrogels, and their application in different fields, such as sensor and actuator fabrication, biomedicine, and soft electronics, are introduced. Furthermore, the development direction and application prospects of conductive hydrogels are proposed.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00642#

Hydrogels were synthesized by a copolymerization reaction of nanofibrillated cellulose (CNF) with acrylic acid (AA) and acrylamide (AM) and N,N-methylene-bis-acrylamide (MBA) as a cross-linker and their absorption performance as a function of composition was determined. Hydrogels with 4% by weight CNF had swelling of about 250 g/g and with 7% CNF about 200 g/g for water. Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of the reaction pathways and the electronic properties of the cellulose and monomers were investigated through density functional theory calculations. Thermodynamic investigations revealed that the radical formation of cellulose that initiates the hydrogel process can occur through the breaking of the homolytic covalent bonds C6–OH and C3–OH. The results show that the reaction of CNF with monomers is thermodynamically favorable in the decreasing order of AM, AA, and MBA. The kinetic study also indicates that the reaction kinetics of CNF with AM is faster than with AA which is much faster than with MBA. Overall, this study has elucidated some of the key chemical characteristics that impact the derivatization of nanocellulose structures to produce advanced renewable bioproducts.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03500

## Tuesday, July 28, 2020

### National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act 11/14/1986

Fri, 14 November 1986 = 12th of Cheshvan, 5747
י״ב בְּחֶשְׁוָן תשמ״ז
"י״ב בְּחֶשְׁוָן תשמ״ז" = 126 (Hebrew Ordinal)

## Monday, July 27, 2020

### Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco and sexual sin #122 #81 #18 #180 #277 #73 #19 #46 #666 #1377

She was born to rule from there.....

The motto and Seal of San Francisco was created on Nancy Pelosi's birthday!

Nancy Patricia Pelosi born March 26th 1940 on the SF seal's 40th birthday!

"abortion" = 40 (Full Reduction)

San Francisco sit on the 122nd meridian
"abortion" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"San Francisco" = 122 (English Ordinal)

The motto and Seal of San Francisco was created on Nancy Pelosi's birthday!

The current seal was adopted in 1859 by the Board of Supervisors, and superseded a similar seal that had been adopted seven years earlier. The shield shows the Golden Gate and the hills on each side as it looked in 1859, and a paddlewheel steamship entering San Francisco Bay.

Above the shield is a crest with a phoenix, the legendary Greek bird rising from the ashes. The shield is flanked by two supporters, a miner, holding a shovel, in dexter; and a sailor, holding a sextant, in sinister, both in 1850s period clothing. At the feet of the supporters are a plow and anchor, emblems of commerce and navigation. Below the shield is a motto that reads "Oro en paz, fierro en guerra", which is Spanish for "Gold in peace, iron in war"

"Nancy P Pelosi" = 149 (English Ordinal)
"skull and bones" = 149 (English Ordinal)
"Nancy P Pelosi" = 59 (Full Reduction)
"freemasonry" = 59 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"Nancy P Pelosi" = 58 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"freemasonry" = 58 (Full Reduction)

Sexual sin, Venus and the number 18

WEARING PURPLE

122

"San Francisco" = 122 (English Ordinal)
"satanic" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"abortion" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"pharaoh" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"great american eclipse" = 122 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"Contract" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"silence" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"judgment" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"death row" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"cemetery" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"skull + bones" = 122 (Jewish Ordinal)
"dire warning" = 122 (English Ordinal)

"Nancy DeAlesandro" = 277 (Reverse Ordinal)
"the sin of homosexual sex" = 277 (English Ordinal)

San Francisco co-ordinates
"37.7749° N, 122.4194° W" = 97 (English Ordinal)
"the sin of homosexual sex" = 97 (Full Reduction)

"37.7749° N, 122.4194° W" = 77 (Reverse Ordinal)
"Judaism" = 77 (English Ordinal)

"37.7749° N, 122.4194° W" = 1000 (Jewish)
"Hebrew" = 1000 (Jewish)

"37.7749° N, 122.4194° W" = 70 (Full Reduction)
"Saint Valentines Day" = 70 (Full Reduction)

"sexual immorality" = 73 (Full Reduction)
"child sacrifice" = 73 (Full Reduction)

"sexual immorality" = 777 (Satanic)
"Planned Parenthood" = 777 (Satanic)
"Thou shalt not kill" = 777 (Satanic)
"toxic masculinity" = 777 (Satanic)

Sin Abortion 122 Baal

They're using the number 122 for things relating to sin in the sexual area. Did you see my work on abortion and 122? I was in shock for awhile after seeing these numbers....

Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Court on January 22, 1973.

1/22/1973
1/22= 122
"abortion" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
1973 = 73
"child sacrifice" = 73 (Full Reduction)
"sacrifice" = 73 (English Ordinal)
"children" = 73 (English Ordinal)

1+22+19+73=115
"Killing" = 115 (Reverse Ordinal)
1+22+73= 96
"family" = 96 (Reverse Ordinal)
1+22+1+9+7+3= 43
"babies" = 43 (Reverse Full Reduction)
1+2+2+1+9+7+3= 25
"women" = 25 (Full Reduction)

NY legalized infanticide on the 46th anniversary of Roe v. Wade January 22, 2019

They lit the WTC pink...The spire was placed on the top of the tower making it 1776 feet tall on a partial solar eclipse...
"Partial Solar Eclipse" = 122 (Reverse Full Reduction)
Celebrating killing babies...
"abortion" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"judgment" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)

1/22/2019
1/22= 122
"abortion" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
2019 = 19
"egg" = 19 (Full Reduction)
"DNA" = 19 (English Ordinal)
"Bel" = 19 (English Ordinal)
46th anniversary
"sacrifice" = 46 (Full Reduction)
"children" = 46 (Full Reduction)

1+22+20+19=62
"egg" = 62 (Reverse Ordinal)
"DNA" = 19 (English Ordinal)
"Bel" = 62 (Reverse Ordinal)
1+22+2+0+1+9=35
"Divide" = 35 (Full Reduction)
1+2+2+2+0+1+9=17
"Kill" = 17 (Full Reduction)
"young" = 17 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"Bel" = 17 (Reverse Full Reduction)
Temple of Bel מקדש בל
"מקדש בל" = 17 (Hebrew Reduction)

NY legalized infanticide on the 46th anniversary of Roe v. Wade January 22, 2019

They put the "arch of Baal" up in NYC on 9/19/2016
From and including: Monday, September 19, 2016
To, but not including Tuesday, January 22, 2019
122 weeks
"abortion" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)
"Death Row" = 122 (Reverse Ordinal)

All these go together....

"Temple of Bel" = 666 (English Sumerian)
"Mark of Beast" = 666 (English Sumerian)
"vaccination" = 666 (English Sumerian)

"world domination" = 1116 (English Sumerian)
"Temple of Bel" = 1116 (Reverse English Sumerian)
"Mark of Beast" = 1116 (Reverse English Sumerian)
"vaccination" = 1116 (Reverse English Sumerian)

"The Monumental Arch of Palmyra" = 404 (Reverse Ordinal)
"The Monumental Arch of Palmyra" = 2424 (Reverse English Sumerian)
There are 404 verses in revelation, there are 2424 days between the 2017 and 2024 eclipses that make a cross over the United States.

Look at this!
From and including: Monday, January 22, 1973
To, but not including Tuesday, January 22, 2019
552 months excluding the end date.
"Baal" = 552 (Reverse English Sumerian)

1+22+7+3=33 (abortion legalized)
1+22+1+9=33 (infanticide legalized)
"Arch of Baal" = 33 (Chaldean)
"genesis" = 33 (Full Reduction)
"seed" = 33 (English Ordinal)
"sex" = 33 (Reverse Ordinal)
"birth" = 33 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"doctor" = 33 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"Holocaust" = 33 (Full Reduction)
"society" = 33 (Full Reduction)
"Arch of Baal" = 33 (Chaldean)

33+33=66
"woman" = 66 (English Ordinal)
"homicide" = 66 (English Ordinal)
"family" = 66 (English Ordinal)
"mankind" = 66 (English Ordinal)

1+22=23
There are are 23 chromosomes
"woman" = 23 (Chaldean)
"male" = 23 (Reverse Full Reduction)
"life" = 23 (Full Reduction)
"murder" = 23 (Chaldean)

In humans, each cell normally contains 23 pairs of chromosomes, for a total of 46. ...
"sacrifice" = 46 (Full Reduction)
"children" = 46 (Full Reduction)

The 23rd pair, the sex chromosomes, differ between males and females. Females have two copies of the X chromosome, while males have one X and one Y chromosome. The 22 autosomes are numbered by size.

10/22 is Intersex Awareness Day
Intersex people were previously referred to as hermaphrodites, "congenital eunuchs",
10/22=1022
Closet Homosexual in Jewish Gematria Equals: 1022
Androgyny in Jewish Gematria Equals: 1022

The Pope released his doves that were attacked by a crow and a seagull on 1/26

"wormwood" = 126 (English Ordinal)

Revelation 8:11
"And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." = 1377 (English Ordinal)

1377 in roman numbers is 1377 Jewish...
"MCCCLXXVII" = 1377 (Jewish)
"The beast of revelation" = 1377 (Jewish)
"MCCCLXXVII" = 122 (English Ordinal)
"San Francisco" = 122 (English Ordinal)
"pope francis" = 122 (English Ordinal)

122 number of sexual sin.....
"World Health Organization" = 122 (Full Reduction)

It all goes together....

## Friday, July 24, 2020

### China Admits Using COVID-19 To Take Down Trump

The video below is propaganda made on Official Chinese Media. It actually admits that China utilized the coronavirus to help take down President Trump and other populist world leaders.

When the Wuhan virus broke out in late December, there were researchers that pointed at the source being the Wuhan Virology Lab, where similar viruses were being researched and tested.

At first, those suggesting such a connection were scoffed at. After all, Chinese state media had pointed to the virus being naturally occurring and sourced it as starting from the wet market in Wuhan. The corporate controlled media in the West parroted that line.

Months later, most have accepted the logic that the Wuhan Virology Lab had something to do with the initial outbreak of the virus.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has increasingly had problems with more nationalistic leaders such as Trump, Johnson, and Bolsonero. These three and others have recognized China’s growing threat to Western dominance, especially if left unchecked.

https://israelunwired.com/ccp-take-down-trump/