SpaceX 200

 

"Georgia Guidestones" = 200 (English Ordinal)

"Valentines Day" = 200 (Reverse Ordinal)

"Martin Luther King" = 200 (English Ordinal)

"Drain the Swamp" = 200 (Reverse Ordinal)

13+13+57+84 = 167

13+13+5+7+8+4 = 50

1+3+1+3+5+7+8+4 = 32

13+13+84 = 110 

German biologist Emil Henning is considered to be the founder of the PhyloCode (cladistics).  He proposed a classification system which represented repeated branchings of the family tree, as opposed to the previous systems, which put organisms on a "ladder", with supposedly more "advanced" organisms at the top.

The PhyloCode was first proposed to academia in 1968.  A set of rules governing species names was included in the draft.  There was deep division within the participants and no consensus could be made as to whether the system should be binomen (binary naming in two parts, for instance Homo sapien) or epithet based (naming with byname, description, or  attribution, such as Richard the Lion-Hearted).

A few years after the PhyloCode was proposed, in 1975, a working group convened a decision made to genetically modify all life on earth.  The implications of this effort encompass the world as we know it, or used to know it.

The International PhyloCode:

Breaks God given barriers between species

Claims the right to semantic trickery, such as what is ‘natural’

Creates distinctions between kinds/classes and individuals by what they contribute.

Defines what is ‘real’ and what is not ‘real,’ in essence, reality itself.

Treating species as kinds or nominal classes will entail that they have no real existence and that they are purely conventional groups of organisms.

Rejects the issues of reality and spatiotemporal localization and the metaphysical  (God, afterlife, etc…) concerns of individualism

It establishes a war between classes and individuals

Traditional ranks have been eliminated so anything can be related to anything

Holds that individuals are unsatisfactory

Abandons typological thinking which the bible clearly endorses

Exterminates what it means to be human with a new convoluted system

Initial argument for individuality of species and taxa was given free reign in the systematics literature becoming intertwined with a number of more or less related issues, making it virtually impossible to discuss in isolation.

Establishes ‘systematization’ consisting of the ordering of particular things into systems. Systems are more inclusive wholes, based on the relationships that their parts exhibit one to another due to a natural process.

Darwin views species as concrete entities denying the metaphysical and timelessness

Purging of the metaphysical in order to unify the sciences

Contrary to the Bible the nominalist view is that although nature makes things similar and different, the classification of them into kinds or classes is the workmanship of men.

Species are considered as individuals

Urges us to reconsider the standard conception of ‘kinds’ (i.e. question Genesis 1:24)

Changes what is true and what is false in light of revisitability of ‘kind’ definitions by empirical science

Adoption of homeostatic property clusters (HPCs)  Homeostatic property cluster terms are defined by the associated property clusterings understood as ongoing phenomena in the world.  An example is the recent emphasis on syndromic clusters in medicine. 

Homeostasis is imperfect and by definition can evolve over time.

A pre-Darwinian biologist categorizing species IS NOT considered because he would have used fundamental units of God and His creation.  He is predetermined to be offering a false and revisable definition reflecting posteriori judgment.

Although we had no say, on May 24, 2007 the Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature (CPN), consisting of 12 elected members from the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature (ISPN), adopted a new article in the International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature (ICPN or PhyloCode) addressing the naming of species in the context of phylogenetic nomenclature. It took ten years to arrive at this decision to introduce a new biological system because it was so controversial.  The new system threw off the chains of traditional identification system including the ranks of the old system. 

Implementation began using dual nomenclatures.  Gradually over time only the International PhyloCode was published. Policies are based upon this theoretical system. Along with the adoption of the clade system will be new burdensome and confusing regulations, to the degree, no man has experienced until this point in history.

"PhyloCode" = 49 (Full Reduction)

"PhyloCode" = 323 (Primes)